COMPANY NEWS

Christmas Closure

It’s that time of year again so may we, at Wenlock Health & Safety, wish all our customers and colleagues a

very happy, healthy and safe Christmas, and New Year

In addition, please note that our office will close from 5pm on Friday 20 December 2019 and re-open at 8am on Thursday 2 January 2020.

Forthcoming Courses

Forthcoming dates and fees for courses for the remainder of 2019 and early 2020 are as follows. Please contact Vicki at Wenlock Health & Safety Ltd (WHS) on 01952 885885 or vicki@wenlockhs.co.uk to book.

Note that all courses will be held at our offices in Jackfield, Telford. However, if any organisation requires attendance by 6 or more employees, a specific course can be arranged at a date, time and location to suit. Please contact the WHS office to discuss your requirements and agree costs.

First Aid

Forthcoming dates for the WHS 1-day Emergency First Aid courses are as follows:

Duration: 1 day (6 hours)

2019 dates:

• 26 November 2019
• 18 December 2019

Cost: £75 + VAT per person

2020 dates:

• 27 January 2020
• 25 February 2020

Cost: £85 + VAT per person (please note the small price increase)

WHS can also run the full 4-day First Aid at Work course for companies who need additional skills and wish to send 4+ candidates; contact Vicki for fees. However, do initially discuss first aid requirements with your own WHS consultant to assess whether the 4-day course is actually appropriate for your circumstances.

IOSH Managing Safely

Duration: 3 days
Dates: 28, 29 & 30 January 2020
Cost: £395 + VAT per person

CITB Courses

IMPORTANT NOTES:

Please be aware that CITB specifies that candidates must be available to attend each session within the course; failure to do so may require a repeat course.

And attendance is vital, not only because it affects the candidate personally, but also because it can seriously affect others. As highlighted in the previous newsletter, because of CITB rules, we may be forced to cancel a course ON THAT MORNING if some candidates don’t turn up.

Forthcoming course dates are as follows; all CITB course fees include lunch.

• Site Management Safety Training Scheme (SMSTS)

Duration: 5 days; 1 day per week
Dates:

• 17, 24, 31 January, 7 & 14 February 2020 (Fridays)
• 6, 13, 20, 27 March & 3 April 2020 (Fridays)

Cost: £495 + VAT per person

• Site Management Safety Training Scheme (SMSTS) Refresher

Duration: 2 days
Dates:

• 4 & 5 December 2019 (Wednesday & Thursday)
• 3 & 4 February 2020 (Monday & Tuesday)
• 1 & 2 April 2020 (Wednesday & Thursday)

Cost: £265 + VAT per person (10% discount when booking 2 or more people)

• Site Supervisors Safety Training Scheme (SSSTS)

Duration: 2 days
Dates:

• 11 & 12 December 2019 (Wednesday & Thursday)
• 10 & 11 February 2020 (Monday & Tuesday)
• 20 & 21 April 2020 (Monday & Tuesday)

Cost: £230 + VAT per person (10% discount when booking 2 or more people)

• Site Supervisors Safety Training Scheme (SSSTS) Refresher

Duration: 1 day
Dates: PLEASE CONTACT WHS; no date currently confirmed

Cost: £160 + VAT per person (10% discount when booking 2 or more people)

• CITB 1-Day Health & Safety Awareness

Duration: 1 day
Dates:

• 13 January 2020 (Monday)
• 16 March 2020 (Monday)

Cost: £125 + VAT per person (10% discount when booking 2 or more people)

Safety Awards

As usual at this time of year, we like to recognise, in a small but significant way, the commendable efforts that some of our clients have made over the last year to tangibly ensure the health & safety of their personal, the public and others. Although we have already seen early but disturbing signs that some companies are becoming either complacent or cash-strapped and, thus, standards seem to be all too easily falling, others demonstrate an exemplary commitment to ensuring the well-being of their workforce and the safety of others. So this year we have two clear winners, both of which are shining examples of how things should be done – and how easy it can be if the commitment is there and personnel are valued.

• Commitment to Safety:

Morris Property Ltd of Shrewsbury.

Working within the 150 year old Morris & Co Ltd group, Morris Property Ltd have expanded into commercial development and contracting over the last decade and, during that time, have shown continual improvement to health & safety and a commitment to ensuring legal compliance. Management are intrinsically involved with maintaining standards and have allowed us to recommend and do what we think is necessary to ensure that health & safety remains paramount throughout the Company’s operations.

• Commitment to Continual Improvement:

Matt Kershaw, Health & Safety Co-Ordinator for Edgebourn Building Contracts Ltd of Stourbridge.

Matt has always shown commitment to improving standards through the Company’s systems in his role as Health & Safety Co-Ordinator, with a clear commitment to training the workforce. He has always worked with the mantra ‘if you wouldn’t do it yourself, then why ask others to do so?’, so has demonstrated a clear empathy. He has spear-headed compliant safe working systems, and personally monitors their effectiveness with a view to continual improvements where necessary.

Congratulations to both our winners; they set a benchmark of achievable construction-based health & safety. Photos will be included in the January 2020 newsletter – well done indeed!

Help with Dyslexia

Dyslexia can be a significantly debilitating condition which, with no obvious outward signs, can be hidden from employers and others, causing anxiety and suppressing confidence. It is a common issue within construction and can cause extreme stress when sufferers are required to write paperwork or undertake courses and tests.

WHS is well aware of the issues and we completely understand the reluctance of individuals to tell employers and, often, us as well. However, it is vital that those who need to know are told so that assistance can be offered. For example, WHS can offer assistance to those taking course and tests if we are informed beforehand – in confidence if necessary.

However, WHS has now taken a step to help both our subscribed employers and their employees to access appropriate government funded assistance. The Government’s ‘Access to Work’ scheme (established as a result of the 2010 Equality Act) is aimed at ensuring people can, not only work towards employment, but also stay in employment by offering practical help for all types of disabilities – including dyslexia. And the best thing about the scheme is that it’s free to employers who have less than 50 employees, and they only charge a nominal amount for larger employers.

The website gives details: https://www.gov.uk/access-to-work
but isn’t brilliant; it can be confusing and onerous when it comes to sorting what is actually available.

However, WHS now has access to a dyslexia specialist in the Telford area who can (free of charge) give first-hand assistance to help individuals through the process of accessing available help – which can include tailored software to help with the writing or understanding of paperwork.

Unfortunately, we can only offer the specialist’s service to those within the broad Telford area – but, if you are local and think you or your employees could benefit from this service, please do not hesitate to contact the WHS office. You don’t get much free these days – so take advantage!

COSHH Assessment Changes

Our COSHH assessment format is changing; the changes will come into effect (at no cost to you) as your documents are re-issued at renewal. The same information will be contained – but in a different order. The changes are primarily to make the documents more user-friendly so the information that must be known by workers is foremost, whilst other information required by management and emergency services (requiring technical details about substances) will be last.

So some timely reminders at this point:

• COSHH assessments are required by law; data sheets are insufficient
• COSHH assessment information must be transmitted clearly to workers involved
• COSHH assessments must be held on site both for reference and to give emergency services information about what the products contained and the likely hazards

Permits to Work Changes

Other templates are changing and, as highlighted in the cover letter when you receive your renewal pack, it is essential that you familiarise yourself with all documents and make the necessary changes internally.

One such change is to the permit-to-dig which has been required for ground disturbance for decades now. However, the industry standard terminology has changed from permit-to-dig to the (rather more accurate) ‘permit for ground disturbance’. You can carry on using the current format until such time as the new one is issued to you; but you must be aware that:

The permit-to-dig has always been intended to cover any ground disturbance at all (refer to your Health & Safety Manual) as it is just as likely that an underground service will be hit when banging in (e.g.) road pins or erecting fencing as when excavating. So be sure you are using the permit to ensure safety with all ground disturbance, no matter how shallow, brief or seemingly minor.

The Importance of Environmental Management

Environmental issues have hit the headlines recently as protestors try to ensure politicians actually do something about the current unsustainable use of our finite resources. However, when it comes to construction, there are a huge number of other day-to-day issues and legal requirements that we all need to be aware of, such as permits and exemptions, hazardous waste, allowable processes, siting of compounds, etc, etc.

Fines for breaches of environmental law can be enormous and prosecutions are frequent, often involving contractors who are either unaware of, or choose to ignore, legal requirements. Those of our customers who already hold a WHS Environmental Management System (EMS) are urged to ensure that all the information therein is read, understood and acted upon. Those customers who don’t yet have an EMS are strongly recommended to purchase one so that you know the facts before it’s too late! Even trades-people have legal requirements relating to (e.g.) disposing of and transporting waste, etc.

Our EMS comes at a bargain and one-off price of £150 + VAT for basic contractors (the fee may be a little more for unusual circumstances) and is reviewed and renewed each year free of charge upon re-subscription. It is worth this small outlay to have the information at your fingertips.

HSE NEWS

HSE Enforcement

(With grateful thanks to the HSE for all photos; refer to https://bit.ly/2OPpuRV for further photos)

It’s pretty obvious why the following photos were subject to HSE enforcement….

But what about these?

If you are unsure of the answers, please contact WHS immediately!

Believe it or not, WHS still sees unsafe practices such as these during site inspections! And never forget that the Principal Contractor will be held liable by the HSE for any such unacceptable site conditions – because, even if the sub-contractor is proved to be adequately health & safety competent, the Principal Contractor’s site management MUST (by law) control who is working on site AND HOW THEY ARE WORKING! It’s fundamental and the HSE would always investigate the adequacy of site management first. For example:

Bowmer & Kirkland fined a total of over £356,000 after the director of the roofing contractor’s sub-contractor, JKW Roofing, was blown 11 metres off the roof of a school new-build in 2017 in the very high winds (in excess of 150km per hour) from Storm Doris. Roofing contractor, Advanced Roofing, was fined over £35,000 and the JKW director (and sole trader) given a 12 month conditional discharge and ordered to pay over £6000 costs. Yes, the roofer and the roofing sub-contractor should have refused to work – if they were competent roofers, they would have known that roof-work in significant (let alone high) winds should never happen. But neither should the Principal Contractor have ever allowed it to happen. Hence, the HSE found the Principal Contractor, PDR, had failed to plan, manage and monitor the work at height and was, thus, under CDM, almost totally liable for the serious injuries sustained; hence Bowmer & Kirkland was fined over 10 x that of Advanced Roofing.

And again, PDR Construction Ltd was fined a total of £233,000 and the roofing contractor, Metcalfe Roofing & Building Services Ltd, fined £2,000 after a roofer fell 3 metres through a fragile roof. The HSE found the Principal Contractor, PDR, had failed to plan, manage and monitor the work at height and was, thus, under CDM, almost totally liable for the serious injuries sustained.

An Important Reminder

Following on from the risks highlighted above related to high winds, WHS reminds contractors that the Work at Height Regs require competent recorded scaffold / access equipment inspections:

• Before first ascent – and, no, the Handover Certificate does not serve this purpose
• Every 7 days minimum
• After EVERY event that could have compromised its integrity

Events that could compromise the integrity and safety of work at height equipment certainly include high winds, flooding, ground instability, being hit by plant or vehicles, etc. The equipment MUST be inspected following such events BEFORE the next ascent BY LAW for obvious reasons, but WHS rarely sees this done.

Another Important Reminder

You may have seen on national news that Wood Flour Mill of Bosley (under the ownership of Wood Treatment Ltd) has been charged with Corporate Manslaughter, and a director and 2 manager charged with gross negligence, following the deaths of 4 employees in July 2015; the extensive uncontrolled wood dust exploded causing the mill to collapse and fires to break out: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-50349682

This was an appalling case resulting from management’s complete disregard for the safety of employees despite previous warnings. We await the outcome of the court case; the sentencing is likely to be considerable.
But a reminder – dusts can kill, and some airborne dusts resulting from flammable materials can kill by exploding. Significant concentrations (i.e. uncontrolled) wood, grain, dusts, sugars, even coffee and cocoa, can explode if there is an ignition source. And that ignition source could be as simple as heat from tools and static from mobiles. As stated above, COSHH assessments are legally required – for very valid reasons. And, in circumstances where flammable dusts are produced, they are absolutely vital. The COSHH assessment must dictate that airborne dusts are prevented as well as further appropriate controls, PPE, etc, something that certainly didn’t happen in this case, with the result that 4 innocent people lost their lives.

INDUSTRY NEWS

Safety on Forward Tipping Dumpers

Forward tipping dumpers are often fitted with cabs – but a word of warning here. The incorporated roll-bar has been a legally required safety feature for over 20 years; however, this does NOT make the cab a ‘safe place’ of work for the driver. The cab itself is not designed to protect the driver from falling materials; hence, the requirement to dismount whilst the dumper is being loaded STILL stands.

Radon

The presence of radon gas within both developing and existing sites in the UK is all too often overlooked. Many of you will have an appreciation of the very real risks to people living or working within affected regions (in a nutshell, radon is carcinogenic) and will know what has to be done to combat those risks. Others may be totally unaware of the risks and oblivious of the (often very simple) ways to control them.

WHS will be issuing a risk assessment for radon within your annual health & safety packs as from January 2020. Whether you are a developer, designer, contractor or, indeed, a business manager working from a static premises, please do make sure you read the risk assessment, digest what is required, and act on the recommendations. And don’t overlook the fact that your own house may be affected as well, so it’s doubly important that you act at home as well if you find your house may be affected.

As a starting point, everyone should make themselves familiar with the UK map from Public Health England, available on: https://www.ukradon.org/information/ukmaps which clearly shows areas of the country potentially affected or clear. Further information can be sought from: https://www.ukradon.org/
However, if anyone would like an email copy of the risk assessment in advance of your annual pack, please do feel free to ring the WHS office.

Underground Services

The following advice has been issued by the Utility Strike Avoidance Group (USAG), an invaluable resource for both groundworks and others who may make contact with utility services and is free to join; for detailed information, go to the website: https://www.utilitystrikeavoidancegroup.org/

To summarise the USAG advice:

• You are not permitted to use mechanical means for ground disturbance (notice we don’t just say ‘excavations’; see above!) within 500mm to 1000mm of a known or suspected underground service.
• The ‘safe’ distance will depend on the level of risk, i.e. an 11kV cable or a high-pressure gas main require a greater safe distance than a water pipe! Utility companies will give advice on their recommended safe distances.

However, WHS would also add:

• Other issues may well affect the standard safe distance, e.g. wet conditions can make electricity arc to vast distances from services. So the risk level MUST be evaluated pre-start ON THE DAY and MUST allow a sufficient margin of error to ensure safety.
• And, no, it is not acceptable to use mechanical equipment when you’ve located the services, no matter what the reason; most excavator drivers are indeed skilful BUT they cannot guarantee they won’t snag the service if they operate the bucket with less than a 500mm buffer zone, even if the risk level is perceived to be low.

These few simple practical rules issued by USAG can help you avoid contact with buried services – and the potential for serious injury and prosecution:

• Use non-conductive hand tools, use gentle foot pressure, DO NOT throw or spike them in the ground.
• Dig in line with utility survey mark outs, DO NOT dig across
• Dig forwards from the edge of the mark out corridor; DO NOT start in the middle of the corridor
• And BEWARE if using picks, pins, spikes and forks to free rocks and break hard layers. DO NOT use in soft soil near services. The worker who used a metal spike to dislodge rocks in this photo suffered serious facial burns when he struck the cable (ringed) and the electricity arced:

Refer also to the generic risk assessments for the voidance of both underground and overhead services.

Mental Health Awareness

WHS has covered mental wellbeing within the construction industry many times in recent years and offers specific courses to help identify and deal with mental health issues before it’s too late.

Additional industry-specific help is available free of charge on the Construction Industry Helpline App:
https://www.constructionindustryhelpline.com/app.html
which is designed to give personal and confidential support to the individual,
or the 24/7 phone line: 0345-605 1956

Distribute this information to all your employees, give a tool box talk, and encourage them to download the App before, rather than when, the issue hits home.

Work at Height – Fall Arrest

The Work at Height Regulations 2005 require that, where scaffold and edge protection (fall prevention measures) are not practicable, fall arrest systems MUST be established to avoid injury through falls. Traditional fall arrest systems include bean bags and air bags, both of which have their problems, and crash decking which can be time-consuming and expensive to erect.

A good alternative to the conventional birdcage crash decking is Rhinodeck which is quick to erect, fully braced, economical system which can, in its steel format, be loaded to 600 kg/m2 (plastic up to 200 kg/m2 ). Edge protection can be incorporated where necessary. A 1-day training course is offered to ensure full competence for the erection of the system and (which is very good news) this is then suitable towards gaining a relevant CSCS card.
Go to: https://www.sayfasystems.co.uk/rhinodeck/ for full details and on-line tools to help you calculate your needs.

If bags are the preferred option, try Airdeck which are fire-rated/retardant, anti-static (ideal for the oil & gas industries), weather-resistant and long-lasting air bags which can prove very economical as they can be transported 50 bags to a pallet.
Go to: https://www.sayfasystems.co.uk/airdeck/ for full details.

Both products are manufactured and distributed by Sayfa Systems who have pioneered a number of excellent work at height safety access and fall protection products.
Go to: https://www.sayfasystems.co.uk/ for their full range of products.

Footnote:

Erection of any type of scaffold system, including crash decking, constitutes ‘temporary works’ and arrangements must, therefore, be made for competence, supervision and monitoring through both erection AND design. Contact WHS for assistance or further information.

GENERAL NEWS

Mobile Phones Whilst Driving

Many of you will have heard in the media that the Government is planning to close the loophole whereby drivers cannot be prosecuted for taking photos, scrolling social media or using their mobile phones for anything other than making calls or texting whilst driving: https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-50250730

It never ceases to amaze us at WHS just how many people try to find loopholes to enable them to carry on doing what is clearly extremely dangerous – whether driving or whilst on site! Whether it’s illegal or not, driving without full concentration is dangerous!

Employers are reminded they are wholly responsible for the behaviour of their employees whilst at work – and this includes whilst driving for work. Those of you who haven’t yet put together a company driving policy should consider this a priority; lay down strict company rules about how you expect your employees to behave behind the wheel, including whether use of mobiles is allowable using blue-tooth (and under what circumstances) or banned completely whilst driving.

Remember, employers are liable for any fines emanating from employees’ breaches of road traffic law unless a sound driving policy is in place and signed by the driver. And prosecutions of employers do happen where accidents have happened as a result of bad driving, tiredness, poor vehicle maintenance, etc. If you need assistance putting a driving policy in place, do contact the WHS office.

Yet Another Victim of Asbestos

On 2 October 2019, father of 5, Phil Moreton passed away, becoming yet another victim of the killer asbestos-related disease mesothelioma. The thing to note about this case is that Phil evidently contracted the disease whilst playing on building sites as a youngster. 36 year old Phil had only been diagnosed 5 weeks before his death. He deteriorated very quickly, losing 5 stone in weight, and was unable to even hold his baby boy in his final days. Read the story and hear heart-rending testimony from Phil’s widow: https://dailym.ai/2WQGkBK

Can we just make yet another plea to everyone, whether you’re an employer or an individual doing DIY, please make absolutely sure you do NOT disturb asbestos. For the sake of your family, make sure you have an asbestos survey before you touch anything in buildings built or started before 2000. And, if you don’t know, don’t touch! Just imagine how bad Christmas will be for Phil’s wife and children.

AND FINALLY

With sincere thanks to the HSE for all photographs

First off this time, we highlight the consequences of, what can only be described as very poor site management. The Bowmer & Kirkland prosecution discussed above has already illustrated the points that the Principal Contractor is, under CDM, liable for safety in all work under their control, whether carried out directly or by sub-contractors. Here are a few more examples of the consequences of failing to properly manage sites – not only were contractors prosecuted but, more importantly, people got hurt. And do note also that management is just as likely to be held personally accountable these days as the businesses themselves.

Management

• Clancy Docwra Ltd was fined a total of over £1,108,000 and site supervisor, Daniel Walsh, given a 6-month suspended sentence and ordered to pay costs of £15,000 after a worker was struck by an excavator and killed during night work. The victim had been disconnecting lifting accessories from metal piles when he was hit and crushed against a concrete wall. Not only had the Principal Contractor failed to plan and manage the work, but Walsh was also found to have failed to take reasonable care of persons under his control.
• BAM Nuttall Ltd was fined a total of almost £839,000 after a worker was seriously injured when he was hit on the head by a large polystyrene block falling from an excavator bucket. It should have been obvious that an excavator bucket is not appropriate lifting and transportation equipment for such a large object but this had not been challenged.
• Principal contractor, PDR Construction Ltd was fined a total of £233,000 and sub-contractor, Metcalfe Roofing & Building Services Ltd, fined £2,000 after a worker fell 3 metres through non-load-bearing mesh, suffering multiple injuries. PDR had failed to plan and carry out the work in a safe manner.
• Bifrangi UK and Italian contractor, Zamperoni F.lli Srl, were fined totals of over £146,000 and £55,000 respectively after a Zamperoni employee fell 5.4 metres through a fragile roof and sustained multiple broken bones. Both companies had failed to risk assess, properly plan for the roof-work and establish safe systems.
• RW Hill (Felixstowe) Ltd was fined a total of almost £39,000 following the death of a worker employed by a specialist concrete sub-contractor. A concrete pump hose had become blocked then, as the blockage dislodged under the increasing pressure, it whipped round violently, killing the worker and injuring another. The Company had failed to adequately plan and manage the operation by not establishing an exclusion zone, ensuring competent supervision and providing suitable information to the contractor.
• Navkaar Ltd was fined a total of almost £39,000 after an HSE inspector found that the Company had failed to prevent risks from falls from height, exposure to asbestos and dangerous electrical systems. The Company had been found to breach CDM duties to ‘plan, manage and monitor’ work on site – not to mention countless other legal duties by the sound of it!
• Williams Homes (Bala) Ltd was fined a total of over £67,000 after a sub-contract joiner was hit on the head and seriously injured by a falling beam during erection of a timber-frame house. The lifting operation had not been properly planned, managed nor supervised by the Principal Contractor.
• RB Wilson (Electrical) Ltd was fined £24,000 after two members of the public were injured falling through an unprotected floor hatch. Whilst installing a new heating system in a domestic property under contract to the local council, the Company had failed to put physical barriers or warning signs around the uncovered floor hatch, with the result that the occupier and her brother-in-law fell through the gap.

Footnote:
WHS is continually pointing out that safety on all sites is the contractor’s responsibility, whether in a commercial or domestic situation. Just because the work in a domestic situation tends to be relatively minor, this does not mean that safety is secondary; indeed, as the occupants tend to be present, ensuring that everyone is kept protected and safe is even more of a priority as this case proves.

Work at height

• Roofing contractor, Henderson & Aitken Ltd, was fined £53,000 after a fatal fall of a worker from a scaffold ladder; the victim had been told by a director to erect the scaffold, despite being unqualified. The ladder had only been fixed to one style using nylon cord; as the worker exited the scaffold, the ladder slipped sideways by just 20 cms, causing him to fall to his death.
• Weathervane Roofing & Building Ltd was fined a total of over £21,000 and its director, Ian Wilkinson, sentenced to a 12-month community order, carry out 160 hours of unpaid work and pay costs of £1,125, after a worker fell 15 metres through a skylight and sustained serious injuries. The Company had not planned a safe system of work for the replacement of the fragile sheeted roof, nor had they provided any edge protection or fall arrest equipment.
• Kingswinford Engineering Co Ltd was fined a total of £27,000 and its repeat contractor, James Durrans, a total of £120,000 after carrying out unsafe pipe repair work on a roof; both companies had ‘assumed’ the other was responsible so neither did anything!! Workers had jumped a 3 metre gap to get onto the wet and slippery roof from a man-cage; no edge protection had been provided, nor had any thought been given to the method of access and fall protection. Both companies had failed to carry out risk assessment and both had wilfully risked life and limb by not even considering a safe system of work.
• Both partners of CB Roofing were sentenced after being observed carrying out unsafe work; they both received 6-month suspended custodial sentences and ordered to carry out 250 hours of unpaid work and pay costs of £1836.
• STS Constructions Ltd was fined a total of almost £28,000 after an HSE inspection highlighted unsafe work at height, including unprotected edges, no fall arrest – and a floor being removed with a breaker whilst workers were standing on it!!! Unbelievable!!!

Important footnote:
In these last 3 cases, there had been no accident but the Companies were seen to be carrying out unsafe work at height without the necessary precautions; beware – the public are observant and the HSE are everywhere!!

Heavy lifting

• National Grid Electricity Transmission PLC was fined a total of almost £352,000 after a worker was killed by a remote-controlled crane. The victim was moving a heavy delivery crate containing a compressor using by operating the remote-control unit himself; however, as he attempted to attach lifting hooks, he was struck by the crane. No training had been provided, nor had the risks of using remote-control been properly assessed.
• Engineering company, IODS Pipe Cad Ltd was fined £60,000 after a worker was struck on the head and killed by a heavy pipe being transported across the yard by a side-loading fork-lift. Clearly not the correct equipment for the movement of such a load and, in addition, the pipe began to roll during the operation as it had not been secured to the forks.

Plant & vehicle segregation

• Minteq UK Ltd was fined a total of over £223,000 after a worker was struck and killed by a forklift whilst she was walking along a designated pedestrian route. Insufficient measures were in place to protect people; the pedestrian walkway ran, unprotected, down the centre of the roadway used by vehicles.
• Cangrain Stores Ltd was fined a total of £200,000 after a worker was struck and killed by a lorry reversing within the yard. No segregation between pedestrians and vehicles had been established.
• The Director of a waste management company, Michael Toon, was ordered to carry out 120 hours of unpaid community work and pay costs of £1,500 after a worker was critically injured whilst using a tele-handler. The worker had become trapped between the machine and a gate post when it moved unexpectedly; it had become stuck and he had dismounted. Toon was present at the time and, in the judge’s words, the offence had been committed ‘with his consent… (and was) attributable to his neglect’

STAY SAFE! IT’S THE BEST CHRISTMAS PRESENT YOU CAN GIVE TO YOUR FAMILY

WHS is working for you; help us to help you.
Our aim is to keep people safe and to keep your company working.
To contact WHS, ring: 01952-885885