COMPANY NEWS

New Course

WHS has highlighted the issue of mental health many times in the past, a condition that is particularly acute in the construction industry. Each year approximately 1 in 4 people in the UK will experience a mental health condition and at least 1 in 6 employees experience common mental health problems in the workplace; figures are much higher in construction, often due to the perceived stigma and fear of discrimination. The culture of fear and silence around mental health can prove costly to employers.

WHS can now offer a new course, an FAA Award in First Aid for Mental Health. This 6-hour, Level 2 qualification is suitable for managers and supervisors, and provides the knowledge of how to recognise a range of mental health conditions, how to start a supportive conversation, and when and how to signpost a person to seek appropriate professional help. Attendees will learn how to recognise and manage stress, and understand the impact of substance abuse. They will learn about the first aid action plan for mental health, how to implement the plan, and how to promote a positive mental health culture within the workplace.

Details of this new FAA Award in First Aid for Mental Health (Level 2 RQF) are as follows; the course will take place at the Wenlock H&S Ltd offices in Jackfield, Telford:

Dates: 3 June 2019 (Monday)
Duration: 1 day (6 hours)
Cost: £75 + VAT per person
Lunch and refreshments included

Book early! Spaces are limited. Contact Vicki on 01952-885885 or via vicki@wenlockhs.co.uk

IOSH Managing Safely

Following the previous IOSH Managing Safely course run at the WHS offices, and in response to demand, we are pleased to offer the following dates for further courses:

Duration: 3 days
Dates: 9, 10 & 11 July (Tuesday – Thursday) 22, 23 & 24 October (Tuesday – Thursday)
Cost: £395 + VAT per person
Lunch and refreshments included

CITB Training Courses

Forthcoming dates and fees for the CITB courses are as follows. As always, courses are held at the WHS training rooms and fees include lunch, refreshments and all course literature.

IMPORTANT NOTES:
Please be aware that CITB specifies that candidates must be available to attend each session within the course; failure to do so may require a repeat course.

  • Site Management Safety Training Scheme (SMSTS)
    Duration: 5 days; 1 day per week
    Dates: 26 April and 3, 10, 17 & 24 May 2019 (Fridays)
    28 June, 5, 12, 19 & 26 July 2019 (Fridays)
    Cost: £495 + VAT per person
  • Site Management Safety Training Scheme (SMSTS) Refresher
    Duration: 2 days
    Dates: 17 & 18 June 2019 (Monday & Tuesday)
    Cost: £265 + VAT per person (10% discount when booking 2 or more people)
  • Site Supervisors Safety Training Scheme (SSSTS)
    Duration: 2 days
    Dates: 29 & 30 April 2019 (Monday & Tuesday)
    12 & 13 June 2019 (Wednesday & Thursday)
    Cost: £230 + VAT per person (10% discount when booking 2 or more people)
  • Site Supervisors Safety Training Scheme (SSSTS) Refresher
    Duration: 1 day
    Dates: 7 June 2019 (Friday)
    Cost: £160 + VAT per person (10% discount when booking 2 or more people)
  • CITB 1-Day Health & Safety Awareness
    Duration: 1 day
    Dates: 7 May 2019 (Tuesday)
    8 July 2019 (Monday)
    Cost: £125 + VAT per person (10% discount when booking 2 or more people)

With all the CITB courses mentioned above and the first aid course below, if any organisation requires attendance by 6 or more employees, a specific course can be arranged at a date, time and location to suit. Please contact the WHS office to discuss your requirements.

First Aid Training

Forthcoming dates for the WHS 1-day Emergency First Aid courses for the remainder of 2019 (to enable you to plan well ahead) are as follows.

  • 25 April 2019
  • 28 May 2019
  • 26 June 2019
  • 25 July 2019
  • 21 August 2019

Courses are also held at WHS training rooms, at just £75 + VAT per person However, please note that refreshments only are included with these courses; no lunch is provided.

New Templates

Over the coming months, WHS will be issuing additional templates and guidance for a range of safety issues, all of which will be free of charge to subscribers; cover letters will explain.

However, in the meantime, there are plenty of additional templates available on-line to help with a range of specific needs. For instance, ladder inspections and tagging systems can be purchased from:
https://bit.ly/2I8Eojt

Reporting Accidents

Can we remind all our clients to notify us please of all accidents and incidents immediately. All too often we are informed only after the HSE or insurance company gets involved, and at that late stage we can’t help you significantly as we won’t have carried out any investigation. We can’t assist if we’re not told!


HSE NEWS

FFI Fee Rate Rise – TAKE NOTE!

The HSE has raised (from 6 April 2019) the hourly rate levied against its ‘Fees For Intervention’ visits to…wait for it…
£154 per hour!

The fee can be levied by HSE inspectors or ‘visiting officers’ where they find a breach of legislation – and, from experience, some are far more stringent than others. Don’t forget that housekeeping, controlled site access, segregation, inspections, vibration, noise, and other basic issues, which many perceive as relatively low risk, are still subject to long-standing legal requirements and MUST be followed correctly. Failure to do so constitutes a ‘breach’ of the law and FFI will apply. In severe cases of course, such breaches could also result in enforcement or prosecution.

So get your act together before it costs you dear!

HSE 2019 Campaigns

This list may not be exhaustive but the HSE have informed us of the following nationwide campaigns. Health remains the big issue and two campaigns will target:

  • Respiratory control and protection through the month of June
  • Materials handling (manual handling) through October

These campaigns apply to ALL industries, will cover ALL types or premises as well as sites, and will be carried out by both the HSE AND the local authority enforcing bodies. In addition, any company can request assistance from a visiting officer free of charge. The VO can visit the premises and give advice to help towards compliance. VOs have no powers of enforcement so these visits will not result in enforcement against the company – unless, of course, the advice is not followed, then the company is asking for it!

– Post-Grenfell (and rather too late in our opinion) the HSE and local authorities will also be targeting towers blocks – both under construction and existing – looking specifically at cladding and fire protection.

Scaffold Advice from the HSE

The HSE also provides very sound guidance on their website about scaffolding, which is particularly useful for those engaging and, thus being responsible for, scaffolders:
http://www.hse.gov.uk/construction/safetytopics/scaffoldinginfo.htm

The ‘Scaffold Checklist’ covers, in great detail, both the legal requirements and recognised industry expectations with regard to:

  • Design, both general and bespoke (TG20)
  • Competence and supervision
  • Inspections

Any contractor or business engaging scaffolders should not do so on price alone. Use the HSE’s checklist to guide your decision based on the proven competence of both scaffolders and scaffold designers; you must have evidence. So a timely reminder that ANY engaging party is responsible in law (particularly CDM) for ensuring that those appointed are appropriately trained and competent, and that they provide, and adhere to, good site-specific design and risk assessments.

WHS has seen some appalling scaffolding practices recently (are standards being allowed to slip to save money?) including unsafe ladders, lack of inspections, inadequate training, unauthorised alterations, and even unsecured planks flying off in high winds.

This is very serious stuff, so please do contact WHS whenever you have need to engage scaffolders and we can assist to ensure compliance…. before it’s too late, as this clearly illustrates: https://bit.ly/2VPK1Gh


INDUSTRY NEWS

Changes to CSCS cards – IMPORTANT

Significant changes are currently taking place within the CSCS card scheme – and all holders, and those wishing to go for a card, must take note of the following.

  • Visitors Cards are being phased out and will cease to exist after 31 August 2020. Any Visitor Card issued now will have that expiry date.
  • Those needing to visit site but as a ‘non-construction occupation’ e.g. vending machine repairs, pest controllers, tyre fitters, etc, do NOT need to hold a CSCS card; the site may have rules about whether that person therefore needs to be accompanied or not. Refer any person who says otherwise to:
  • https://www.cscs.uk.com/applying-for-cards/non-construction-related-occupations/
  • We know that a lot of construction-related professionals (e.g. structural engineers) went for the Visitor Card as, until recently, degrees and other professional qualifications were (quite incomprehensibly) not recognised by CSCS. This significant anomaly has been addressed; so professionals holding standard industry qualifications such as degrees, HNDs, etc., can now gain a relevant profession card through the ‘professionally qualified’ route.
  • Cards issued under ‘grandfather rights’ will cease to exist as from 31 December 2024. CSCS is trying to give plenty of notice here for those affected to gain at least an NVQ level 2 or recognised trade qualification to retain their cards, so plan ahead!
  • In future, there will be more emphasis on continual learning so evidence of CPD will be incorporated into card requirements. Indeed, some specialist CSCS cards already require this.
  • Postal applications have been discontinued; all applications are now on-line only.
  • Electronic cards checks are now prevalent to root out fraud; this is incredibly successful so tell your employees not to even think about it as a successful prosecution will result in a prison sentence!

And to be clear – the card belongs to the INDIVIDUAL, it does NOT belong to the employer. It’s tough on employers who spend money on training and then see their employees leave, but it’s a fact. Employers cannot retain the card. However, a tip, employers can quite legitimately put a ‘training policy’ in place to enable them to claw back wasted money. Speak to WHS for assistance with this.

Changes to the CITB Touch Screen Test – IMPORTANT

As you know, nobody can gain or renew a CSCS card without passing the CITB touch screen test. And there are important changes taking place with this also, aimed at making the test both more user-friendly and valuable. The aim is to ensure test questions are phrased to promote meaningful learning rather than just learning the questions in the book parrot-fashion as happens all too often.

WHS has been asked to take part in future reviews so, as many of you work in very specialist fields, can we ask that you relay any complaints about the wording of questions to Becki in the WHS office and we will relay your comments to CITB. Equally, if specialists identify an area of their work that doesn’t seem to be adequately covered by the test questions, please again can you let us know.

On 26 June 2019, CITB is launching a new-formal touch screen test to remove any ambiguity or misunderstanding and assist applicants to understand how to answer the questions more easily. This is a positive step, and plenty of help is at hand on-line to help applicants prepare in advance and get used to the new format. Refer to: https://bit.ly/2Uxa0pP for further details, and: https://bit.ly/2OXMXOP for examples of the new test questions and format. Other on-line, App or hard copy revision material can be purchased from:
https://citbstore.pearsonvue.com/

IMPORTANT NOTE: Those of you who have booked tests over the next few months MUST check which revision material is relevant to the date of the tests. As the website clearly states, any tests to be taken before 26 June will need the old (2018) revision material; any tests to be taken on or after 26 June 2019 will need new (2019) material. So CHECK which you need BEFORE you purchase!

Pay to be Paid?!

It has come to our attention that some local authorities are now asking contractors to pay extra to be ‘paid early’ and this is being included in tenders with a scored response! This totally unethical practice, which is apparently becoming widespread, actually means that contractors are being asked to pay extra to be paid on time!

We appreciate that local authorities are scratching around for funds to pay for essential work, but this is not the way to do it; if a council can’t afford to pay on time, then it can’t afford to commission the work, end of story. If any of our customers are asked to do this, please do let WHS know immediately. We have access to various pressure bodies who can name and shame, and hopefully get this practice stopped; your company name will not be mentioned to avoid black marks (another unethical practice).

Dust Suppression

We mention wood dusts above and the need to comply with the law. As with ALL dusts, the law says (quite rightly) that we should:

  • Avoid cutting, drilling, etc where possible i.e. avoid producing dusts altogether
  • Suppress at source where cutting, drilling, etc is unavoidable i.e. prevent the dusts becoming airborne through water suppression, vacuum, capture, etc
  • Use PPE (RPE) as a last resort only, not a first choice control to avoid inhalation, or an additional precaution
  • Ensure all RPE wearers are face-fit tested regularly (and, by implication, remain clean-shaven)

The vast majority of sites visited by WHS understand this now, although some still have woefully inadequate or non-existent controls; you have been warned, the HSE will take action if they spot non-compliance.

However, what most companies fail to realise is that inhalation of dusts must be prevented in ALL circumstances. This includes sweeping up of sawdust, plaster dusts, and (yes!) general site dusts deposited in the site office!! Respiratory problems can happen to anyone exposed, even those not involved in the work itself. Suppress (damp down) or vacuum ALL unavoidable dusts; dry-sweeping is unacceptable and (by implication) illegal. Better still, as the law says, don’t produce them in the first place!!

Safe Access for HVAC

As you will all know (well, we hope you do!), safety for maintenance and repair is covered by CDM, not only in relation to the work but, more importantly, with respect to ‘designing out’ risk where possible or, as an absolute minimum, designing to reduce risk as far as possible.

Unfortunately, accidents related to poor access to HVAC equipment are all too common, with dire consequences for both victims and their families, and for the companies involved (including designers). So all HVAC contractors and designers need to impress on their clients the absolute need to agree safe access arrangements, and any refusal by the clients to do so should result in both the contractors and designers refusing to take part in the project as the risks are just too great.

The first objective must always be to avoid placing plant in hazardous areas (e.g. on roofs) but, given that this is sometimes impossible to achieve, the following hierarchy should be considered, in this order:

  1. The only safe access is from inside the building using a staircase rather than a ladder, with permanent edge protection or barriers on the roof to prevent personnel wandering too close to the edge. There will still be risks of falling internally (the same as any with internal staircase) and these must be assessed and reduced as much as possible. But these risks will be a lot less than falling from a roof – and use of a staircase is always safer than use of a ladder.
  2. If external access is unavoidable, a suitable access mechanism must be installed (e.g. a protected staircase or hooped ladder) together with edge protection from the point of entry to any roof or high area.
  3. Harnesses and lines (man-safe systems) are regarded as ‘PPE’; therefore, in law, they can only be used should all other options be impossible to implement. Note – the excuse that alternative systems are too costly is not valid when it comes to the extreme risks of working at height; there have to be genuine reasons for installing personal protective systems only.
    Other issues to consider include fragile roof materials (e.g. roof-lights; all must be secured against falls through) and ‘step-over’ protection that may need to be provided to ensure (a) pipework is not damaged during equipment installation, use or maintenance, and (b) trip hazards are minimised.

GENERAL NEWS

Employee or Contractor?

Public bodies (such as local authorities and the BBC) can check the tax status of their workers by using the Government’s CEST (Check Employments Status for Tax) digital on-line tool:
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/check-employment-status-for-tax

The HRMC states (on the gov.uk website (https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/cest-tool-tested-against-tax-cases) that the system “was rigorously tested during development in conjunction with HMRC’s lawyers against live and settled cases and reflects employment status case law.” In fact, only 24 test cases were used! And this, of course, has resulted in numerous anomalies and incorrect decisions.

The issue was brought to light recently when Lorraine Kelly won her case against HRMC who said she owed £1.2 million in back tax because she was not (according to CEST) genuinely ‘freelance’. Lorraine was able to fight the decision, but it is estimated that CEST gets it wrong in a whopping 42% of cases (!!) and we haven’t all got the funds to fight HMRC through the courts.

The system is due to be rolled out to non-public bodies shortly – so the problem is likely to be compounded. Already, numerous people have been hit with seemingly incorrect decisions; they have been deemed employees of an organisation rather than contractors. HMRC’s response (rather than fixing the problem) is to excuse it by saying the CEST is ‘guidance’ and not intended to be definitive. Try telling that to contractors who have received letters stating that HMRC will “contact you again to find out what action you’ve taken”.
Our advice to anyone genuinely hit by this is to fight the decision by (a) contacting HMRC and (b) pointing out to the employing organisation that CEST is, in HMRC’s words, ‘guidance’ only and that the conclusion is incorrect.

Hidden Hazards

Just look at this warning from the Police: https://bit.ly/2Kr140v Who would have thought that a simple item like a lanyard, something that so many of us wear, could cause so much damage? So, our advice to all readers is to remove all large objects, such as lanyards, chunky necklaces and brooches, etc, from your person before driving to avoid additional injury in crash situations, or even a lesser situation where air-bags are deployed.

Even spectacles can cause severe injury to the head in such situations – but, if you need them for driving, the risk of removing them is greater than the risks resulting from contact with air bags!

HR

A reminder that the following national minimum wage per hour rates apply from 1 April:

  • £8.21 25 years old and over
  • £7.70 21 – 24 years old
  • £6.15 18 – 20 years old
  • £4.35 School leaving to 17 years old
  • £3.90 apprentices under 19 years old or those over 19 in the first year of apprenticeship

AND FINALLY

As always, the following prosecutions represent only a small percentage of those that successfully go through court each month. And never forget, even if the HSE doesn’t prosecute, the knock on effects of enforcement (prohibition and improvement notices) can be phenomenal. And don’t forget the £154 per hour for merely a telling off too!


Work at height

  • Riverdale Developments Ltd was fined a total of over £21,000 after a worker fell 2.7 metres through an open stairwell, sustaining serious multiple injuries. A risk assessment had been carried out for the refurbishment but the company had failed to install edge protection to, or air bags beneath, the gaps in the floors.
  • RFT Repairs Ltd was fined a total of over £155,000 after a worker fell 2 metres whilst carrying out repairs. There was no edge protection in place and even the ladder used to access the roof was unsafe; it had not been secured so it slipped and caused the fall
  • Kenneth Morris, trading as K&M Pointing, was given a 26 week prison sentence, suspended for 2 years, 180 hours community service, and ordered to pay £2,000 in costs after been caught exposing workers to falls from height and silica dust. He had deliberately not installed any edge protection (to platforms at 6 metres!!) or dust capture in order to save money…well Mr. Morris, what did you actually save?
  • ASA Property Management Ltd was fined a total of over £12,500 after an incomplete staircase collapsed, severely injuring two workers. The joiner erecting the staircase had warned the site manager that it was incomplete but poor communication with workers led to one being unaware and falling from the staircase as he used it, and another also being injured beneath.
  • Karro Foods was fined a total of over £1.86 million after two workers fell 4 metres through a roof-light and sustained serious injuries. The two company employees had been instructed to go onto the roof to investigate a leak, but neither had been told about the roof-lights nor given any form of fall-protection.
  • H&M Distribution Ltd was fined a total of over £67,000 after an agency delivery driver fell from his wagon during delivery of beer kegs. The driver had been using a pallet-truck to move kegs from the wagon but fell backwards from the edge of the raised tail lift. He sustained serious injuries, some of which were as a result of several kegs falling on top of him.

N.B. These last three cases are an important reminder that the Work at Heights Regs relate to ALL UK industry, NOT JUST CONSTRUCTION!! All employers must assess the risk, pass on the information and provide adequate protection against falls down or (as in this case) through.

Health issues

  • Faiveley transport Tamworth Ltd was fined a total of £135,000 after exposing workers to uncontrolled hand-arm vibration over a 10 year period. Workers had reported high vibration levels and lengthy periods of use but no action had been taken and there appeared to be no intention to do so. The result was that several workers developed symptoms of HAVS (hand-arm vibration syndrome).
  • Fine Organics Ltd was fined a total of over £241,000 after exposing workers to harmful chemicals and causing long-term skin damage. The company had failed to carry out adequate risk assessments, prevent chemical release and spread of contamination, properly decontaminate affected areas, and provide health surveillance.

WHS is working for you; help us to help you.
Our aim is to keep people safe and to keep your company working.
To contact WHS, ring: 01952-885885